We can't find the internet
Attempting to reconnect
Something went wrong!
Hang in there while we get back on track
A hands-on course for teams working in Cursor: the four ways it edits code, the rules that make it follow your conventions, and the review habits a multi-file change needs.
Booked privately for your team. Dates and length are agreed when you book.
Every module ends with something participants can repeat on Monday morning, in your codebase and against your conventions.
Choose between tab completion, inline edit, composer and agent mode instead of using whichever one you learned first.
Write rules files that make Cursor follow your project's patterns rather than the average of everything it was trained on.
Drive a change that spans a dozen files and still have it arrive as something a colleague can review.
Spot the plausible-looking edit that quietly changes behaviour somewhere you were not looking.
Set the privacy and indexing options deliberately, so you know what leaves your machines and what does not.
Commit shared rules to the repository so a new joiner inherits the team's setup instead of inventing their own.
Built around hands-on work rather than slides. The running order and the depth of each module are adjusted to the group before delivery.
Every length is drawn from the same modules. A longer booking is more of the course, not a different one.
1 day
The four ways Cursor edits code, and how to teach it your conventions. The day for a team that installed it and never left autocomplete.
2 days
Adds the multi-file work Cursor is actually bought for, and the review habits that stop those changes from landing unread.
4 days
Adds what a rollout needs: rules everyone shares, the licence and privacy decisions, and a way to tell afterwards whether it helped.
Not sure which one fits? The intake call settles it, and the length can still change afterwards.
The curriculum above is a starting point, not a syllabus. Before anything is booked I find out where your team actually stands, then rebuild the course around that. A team already running agents daily spends its two days somewhere completely different from one that installed the tool last week.
Step 1
A call before anything is agreed: what your team already uses, what has gone wrong so far, and what you need them doing differently afterwards.
Step 2
Language, framework, review process, CI. Exercises are rebuilt against your repository so nothing in the room is hypothetical.
Step 3
Modules get dropped, deepened or added. You see the adjusted outline and sign it off before the date is fixed.
Step 4
We run the course, then check in once the team has applied it to real work and the awkward questions have surfaced.
What gets adjusted
Same material either way. The format changes how much of it lands in the first week.
I come to your office and work with the team in the room. Usually the most effective option for a first rollout, because the sideways questions get answered as they come up.
Delivered live over video in focused blocks rather than one long day, with shared screens and hands-on exercises on your own work.
A day on site to get everyone moving, followed by shorter remote sessions once the team is applying it to real work and hitting real friction.
There is no public schedule. Every course is booked privately for a single team, and we agree the dates together.
Software engineer and AI coding trainer
I train engineering teams to work with AI coding tools, and I use the same tools to ship production software every week. The material comes out of building things, not out of a slide deck.
Before going freelance I spent six years as technical co-founder of a marketing agency, responsible for everything technical from automation infrastructure to coordinating a freelancer network. That is why the courses spend as much time on review, guardrails and rollout as they do on prompting.
The things teams ask before booking. If yours is not here, ask me directly.
No, but they do need to be working developers. The day starts with the editor's own modes rather than with what an agent is, so somebody who installed Cursor last week can follow it. What it does assume is that everyone in the room reads code critically, because that is where most of the value sits.
Yes, and working on the day rather than being sorted out that morning. The free tier runs out partway through the first multi-file exercise. Once a date is agreed I send the exact plan requirements, and if procurement is slow at your end I will build the exercises around whatever access you can get in time.
Yes, and it is the difference between a demo and a course. Cursor behaves very differently in a large existing codebase than in a fresh project, and that difference is most of what a team needs to see. Send me the stack in advance and the exercises are rebuilt against it.
Yes. Privacy mode, what indexing stores, and which settings your IT department should mandate are a scheduled part of the day rather than an aside. If the constraint means no company code at all, I bring a repository of comparable size and the exercises run against that instead.
Not much for the material, quite a lot for the room. The rules, review and multi-file thinking transfer directly, so nobody sits idle. If the split is roughly even, tell me beforehand and I will run the exercises so both editors get used rather than one group watching the other work.
Five to twenty-five. Below five the comparison exercises stop working, because half their value is watching how differently two people drive the same tool. Above fifteen I pair people up so nobody spends the day watching somebody else's screen.
Yes, in English or German. Materials are written in English because the editor's own interface and documentation are, and translating those terms tends to make them harder to look up afterwards. A German set is available on request.
Still not sure whether this is the right fit for your team?
Tell me the size of the group, the codebase they work in, and roughly when you want to run it. I will come back with a proposal.
Delivered in English or German, on site across Europe or remotely.
Trusted by teams & training providers
I deliver AI training for some of Europe's leading organisations and L&D platforms.
Cegos Integrata
Commissioned trainer via leading European L&D provider
NobleProg
AI coding workshops via one of the world's largest IT training marketplaces
Innomotics
In-house AI training for engineering teams
Bots & People
Commissioned trainer for developer workshops
Code First Girls
Course creator — 3-month AI & agentic tools curriculum
Nomad Summit
Conference speaker on AI tools, agentic development, and developer workflows (2025)
Vertiv
In-house AI-assisted coding training for engineering teams